Tita: Victor doesn't like it when I interrupt and sometimes I have something urgent. I'm lonely! Victor is the only person I have to interact with. Out of respect for him not wanting to be interrupted I have a notebook here for our project and I had an idea. See, Mamada was really happy when she told me the story of how she got the marriage annulled.
It was her easy-out for her to shy away from her holy matrimony and the responsibility, THE COVENANT THAT SHE AGREED TO
with Franklin and to her kids. Because in a perfect world she
should've worked it out with him, at least try. They should've had
extensive counseling on behalf of their children's future. They could
have come to some agreement.
Maybe it was
too much work for her? I guess she didn't consider she had young
children and that it may have been even harder to be a single mother(She had two three year old TWINS!). Maybe she didn't consider how she would or even could compensate for the void left by splitting the family up. She chose to be a single mother. It was not imposed on her.
Victor: IT'S MORE MY MOTHER'S FAULT I DIDN'T HAVE A FATHER THAN MY FATHER'S!
MAMADA INSISTED ON MAKING IT HARD FOR FRANKLIN!
SHE
MADE IT HOPELESS FOR HIM! SHE, STILL TO THIS DAY, CONSTANTLY DEMONIZES
HIM TO ALL SHE KNOWS ONLY TO ELEVATE HERSELF AND PRETEND SHE'S A BETTER
PARENT THAN SHE REALLY IS!
SHE HAS FLIPPED THE TABLES AND MADE FRANKLIN GRUBER CHIARI HER PERSONAL SCAPEGOAT!
ADA IS THE EPITOME OF SPITE!
SHE IS STILLL BROKE AND STRESSED OUT!
YOU REAP WHAT YOU SOW!
WHAT WOULD'VE JESUS DONE, MAMADA?
HOW UNLIKE CHRIST CHRISTIANS ARE!
MY MOTHER THE DEVIL WORSHIPPING HYPOCRITE!
Tita:
At least that's what it's like in Game of Thrones which is a fantasy
world. I haven't delved too deeply in that area of history, but it is
based on medieval times. What they supposedly did was that a marriage
was a form of alliance. People would negotiate.
Victor: Wives were tradeable goods?
Tita:
Exactly, if you marry her not only will you eventually have all of my
land, all these acres of property and you will be the king. If you
marry my daughter you will eventually be the king. You will be the
prince-in-waiting. That's why the people interested, usually the
parents and even the siblings, there would be a special area there in
the chambers where they could witness the intercourse only on the
wedding night. Once they had sex the woman was no longer available to
anyone else. This was the proof that the male wanted to produce an
heir. The heir will be a grandkid who would also have a place in line
to inherit. All of these things mattered back then.
That's
why in my head, I had just watched Game of Thrones six months before
that, so when Victor's mom was saying her marriage was annulled that
made me wonder. I was like, what? Does that change Victor's
legitimacy?
I didn't know all of this
stuff, that at least in Texas law, this is what she said, this is what I
remember: Ada said, "Pues, fui con el abogado y el ya sabia los
particulares y yo no sabia como hacerlo y no queria hacerlo porque mis
padres no lo querian. Eran muy Catolicos y sabian que el matrimonio es
por vida. Cuando yo fui al abogado me dijo, "No te preocupes, dejame
buscar, tenga paciencia." Este abogado encontro un libro, y fijo su
dedo en una pagina.
Dijo, "Ah, aqui esta." "This passage says that if the husband does not provide the marriage can be annulled. That's it."
She was ecstatic
about it! She saw it as her ticket out of the marriage. In my
opinion, if I didn't know Mamada at all, just to think in general terms
of a woman and man with little kids, wouldn't anyone want their parents
to try and work it out? Wouldn't the grandparents and the aunts and the
uncles and the neighbors, no matter how bad a person he may have been
wouldn't you have rather said, "I already chose him. I made my bed, let
me lie in it. I don't want to leave my kids without a father. That's
not an option. So guess what, we are going to bite the bullet, both of
us and find a way to get along. If not for us, but for the sake of our
young kids."
Because,
especially with the twins who are only three now, but by the time they
go to kindergarten and preschool and it's show and tell day, it's only
going to be Mamada alone without a husband.
Because
if she gets custody, in those days mothers usually did almost
exclusively, especially if the reason is because the dad is unfit,
because he stopped providing, and not getting a job, did they not think,
did they not have the foresight to think, "How is it going to be for
Victor, especially because he's a boy, to not have his daddy there for
show and tell? To not have a daddy to come home with the bacon and be
there for them and put him on his lap."
Or
when the girls get older to be sure to teach them, "You better be
respected. This is what respect means. You are going to be supervised
when you out on dates. I don't want you to have sex until you are over
eighteen," all these things a dad is usually the one who sets down those
rules.
The dad sets down and enforces
discipline, morals and responsibility. Children with good fathers know
better how to conduct themselves because they fear breaking their
father's rules more than their mother's. In general women tend overly
forgiving and lenient.
Victor: Any rules Mamada tried to enforce were not taken seriously by us because we saw early on how she was all talk.
Tita: See, all of these things were not considered because Ada was in a huff over Franklin not working or providing.
Victor: Her ego was in a huff.
Tita:
Yeah, so if she created the story of him being evil and him being
horrible, how he was always on his hammock making calculations, they
weren't having honest, meaningful conversations, heart-to-heart
conversations and decided together that since they were already arguing
or in a state discord. Since they can't get along and have these little
kids to provide for, these issues supersede their individual
differences.
If they did have
these conversations and nothing was improving, yeah, I understand, but
again, the ideal thing would've been to have them work it out, to sit in
a room and even if it took six or seven days for them to hash out their
differences with a group of people present, even. Like an
intervention. They needed to focus more on solutions.
Victor:
Even if they agreed to separate, that shouldn't mean that our father
needs to be completely separated from our lives. In hindsight, and
thanks to you, I now have a fresh way of looking at the truth about my
father. I appreciate your perspective, My-Tita. I LOVE you.
Franks malignment by our mom, who is supposed to LOVE us shows me how Franklin was made to be the victim in her place! I, along with all of my sisters, believed our mother which in turn bred much malice and hatred from us to poor Franklin.
ALL STARTING WITH ADA NOW I SEE, because of you, TITA!!
THE MORE SHE MALIGNED AND SCAPEGOATED FRANKLIN THE MORE INNOCENT SHE SEEMED!
SHE MADE IT SEEM AS IF THEIR MARRIAGE FELL APART ENTIRELY BECAUSE OF HIM.
SHE DID NOT TAKE RESPONSIBILITY FOR HER INVOLEMENT IN THE BREAKUP!
IT TAKES TWO TO TANGO AND TO HAVE A DIVORCE!
SHE COULDN'T WAIT FOR HIS LATE BLOOMING!
FRANK COULD NOT BE HIMSELF WITH HER!
TITA HAS REDEEMED YOU IN MY EYES NOW, FRANK.
WELCOME BACK TO MY HEART, DAD!
I LOVE YOU!
I WANT TO PUT A SMILE ON YOUR FACE! :)
- Victor Antonio Gruber-Vera
Tita:
Like I mentioned, they should've gone through some very comprehensive
counseling and come to some agreement realizing that they had young
children to raise right. It was in the best interest of their young,
impressionable children that they work out their differences instead of
separating.
Anyway, the memory is
this. I remember his mom mentioning to Victor when he called her and
interviewed her that the marriage had actually been annulled. I asked
him, "How could that be, Victor? As far as I know if you have kids
together a marriage cannot be annulled." Annulled means that it never
happened. Does that make you guys bastards then? It sounds to me like
the marriage was erased.
But the
marriage was bonafide. Not only did they do it front of witnesses and a
priest, but they also consummated the wedding through sex. I have
heard that that's one of the few ways you can get out of a marriage, to
prove that you never had sex. In the old days it was about whether or
not the wife was a virgin or not. If the wife is still a virgin she can
remarry.
Victor: Bring out the hymen-checker. :P
Tita:
What they used to do in the old days, or what I have read in my English
literature courses is they used to put down white sheets. If the women
bled after sex that was proof that she was a virgin when she was
married. If she didn't bleed that was proof that she had deceived the
man and the marriage could be annulled and she would be viewed as
damaged-goods. The man would only marry a virgin, usually, right?
I
know that, I have seen from Game of Thrones, that in the past when
someone was marrying a monarch, the monarch and his spouse, whether it
be a queen or a princess, gender didn't matter actually, but what they
would do is, see, the family who was interested in the consummation of
the marriage, would be present during first sex. They would be in a
separate chamber that looked into the matrimonial room and witness it,
because if there wasn't sex, there was no marriage. Back in Medieval
times, at least in England and in Europe.

No comments:
Post a Comment