On psge 129 it says:
"Faced with such contradictions, how might we see behind
the trends and countertrends? No one, alas, has any magic answer to
that question. Despite all the computer printouts, cluster diagrams,
and mathematical models and matrices that futurist researchers use,
our attempts to peer into tomorrow - or even make sense of today -
remain, as they must, more an art than a science.
Systematic research can teach us much. But in the end we must
embrace - not dismiss - paradox and contradiction, hunch,
imagination, and daring (though tentative) synthesis.
In probing the future in the pages that follow, therefore, we
must do more than identify major trends. Difficult as it may be, we
must resist the temptation to be seduced by straight lines. Most
people - including many futurists - conceive tomorrow as a mere
extension of today, forgetting that trends, no matter how seemingly
powerful, do not mereley continue in a linear fashion. They reach
tipping points at which they explode into new phenomena. They
reverse direction. They stop and start. Because something is
happening now, or has been happening for three hundred years, is no
guarantee that it will continue. We shall, in the pages ahead, watch
for precisely those contradictions, conflicts, turnabouts, and
breakpoints that make the future a continuing surprise.
More important, we will search out the hidden connections among
events that on the surface seem unrelated. It does little good to
forecast the future of semiconductors or energy, or the future of the
family (even one's own family), if the forecast springs from the
premise that everything else will remain unchanged. For nothing will
remain unchanged. The future is fluid, not frozen. It is
constructed by our shifting and changing daily decisions, and each
event influences all others."
No comments:
Post a Comment