Oh yeah, I wanted to get this Growing Up Different section on page 383 in my log.
"To begin with, the child of tomorrow is likely to grow up in a society far less child-centered than our own.
The "graying" or aging of the population in all
high-technology countries implies greater public attention to the
needs of the elderly and a correspondingly reduced focus on the
young. Furthermore, as women develop jobs and careers in the
exchange economy, the traditional need to channel all their energies
into motherhood is diminished.
During the Second Wave, millions of parents lived out their own
dreams through their children - often because they could reasonably
expect their children to do better socially and economically then
they themselves had done. This expectation of upward mobility
encouraged parents to concentrate enormous psychic energies on their
children. Today many middle-class parents face agonizing
disillusionment as their children - in a far more difficult world -
move down, rather than up, the socio-economic scale. The likelihood
of surrogate fulfillment is evaporating.
For these reasons, the baby born tomorrow is likely to enter a
society no longer obsessed with - perhaps not even terribly
interested in - the needs, wants, pyschological developments, and
instant gratification of the child. If so, the Dr. Spocks of
tomorrow will urge a more structured and demanding childhood,
Parents will be less permissive.
Nor, one suspects, will adolescence be as prolonged and painful
a process as it is today for so many. Millions of children are being
brought up in single-parent homes, with working mothers (or fathers)
squeezed by an erratic economy, and with less of the luxury and time
available to the flower child generation of the 1960's.
Others, later on, are likely to be reared in work-at-home or
electronic-cottage families. Just as in many Second Wave families
built around a mom-and-pop business, we can expect the children of
tomorrow's electronic cottage to be drawn directly into the family's
work tasks and given growing responsibility from an early age.
Such facts suggest a shorter childhood and youth but a more
responsible and productive one. Working alongside adults, children
in such homes are also likely to be less subject to peer pressures.
They may well turn out to be the high achievers of tomorrow.
During the transition to the new society, wherever jobs remain
scarce, Second Wave labor unions will undoubtedly fight to exclude
young people from the job market outside the home. Unions (and
teachers, whether unionized or not) will lobby for ever-longer years
of compulsory or near-compulsory schooling. To the extent that they
succeed, millions of young people will continue to be forced into the
painful limbo of prolonged adolescence. We may, therefore, see a
sharp contrast between young people who grow up fast because of early
work responsibilities in the electronic cottage and those who mature
more slowly outside.
Over the long pull, however, we can expect education also to
change. More learning will occur outside, rahter than inside, the
classroom. Despite the pressure from unions, the years of compulsory
schooling will grow shorter, not longer. Instead of rigid age
segregation, young and old will mingle. Education will become more
interspersed and interwoven with work, and more spread out over a
lifetime. And work itself - whether production for the market or
prosumption for us in the home - will probably begin earlier in life
that it has in the last generation or two. For just such reasons,
Third Wave civilization may well favor quite different traits among
the young - less responsiveness to peers, less
consumption-orientation and less hedonistic self-involvement.
Whether this is so or not, one thing is certain. Growing up
will be different. And so will the resultant personalities."
No comments:
Post a Comment